Metamask Authentication via Backend API Calls: A Feasibility Study

As a web application developer, integrating user authentication with external services like MetaMask has become increasingly popular. However, currently, transactions are authenticated by MetaMask when interacting with your browser extension. But is it possible to perform the same user steps via backend calls? In this article, we will explore the feasibility of Metamask authentication via backend API calls.

The Current Workflow

When users interact with a web application that uses MetaMask, your browser extension sends an authorization request to MetaMask on behalf of the user. This request includes sensitive information such as the user’s wallet address and a passphrase. MetaMask then verifies this information and allows the user to proceed with the transaction.

The Proposed Solution

To facilitate authentication via backend API calls, we would need to implement the following:

• Backend API: Develop an API that can be integrated into our web application to handle user authentication.

• MetaMask Integration

  

  : Integrate the MetaMask API to authenticate users and execute transactions on their behalf.

• API Calls: Make API calls from our backend to initiate the transaction.

Technical Challenges

Before diving into the implementation, we need to consider several technical challenges:

• Authentication Protocols: We would need to implement authentication protocols such as OAuth or OpenID Connect to securely authenticate users.

• Transaction Validation: Our backend API would need to validate and execute transactions on behalf of MetaMask, ensuring that the transaction is valid and secure.

• Scalability: As our application grows in popularity, we would need to ensure scalability to handle the increased traffic.

Feasibility Study

To assess the feasibility of Metamask authentication via backend API calls, let’s consider a hypothetical example:

Suppose our web application allows users to connect their MetaMask wallets and perform transactions. We would develop an API that accepts user input (e.g. transaction details) and sends it to MetaMask for verification.

Backend API Implementation

Here is a rough draft of the proposed backend API implementation:

Node.js API endpoint
app.post('/auth', (req, res) => {
const { address, secret } = req.body;
// Verify user's wallet address and passphrase with MetaMask
if (!verifyWallet(address)) return res.status(401).send('Invalid wallet address');
if (!verifySecret(secret)) return res.status(401).send('Invalid passphrase');
// Execute transaction using MetaMask API
const { txHash, nonce } = authenticateTransaction(address);
// Send transaction details to MetaMask for verification
metaMask.sendVerificationTx(txHash, nonce)
.then((response) => {
res.json({ success: true });
})
.catch((error) => {
console.error(error);
res.status(500).send('Error verifying transaction');
});
});

MetaMask Integration

To integrate the MetaMask API, we would need to:

• Get User Passphrase: Retrieve the user’s passphrase from the MetaMask wallet.

• Get User Wallet Address: Get the user’s wallet address from the MetaMask wallet.

Once we have these values, we can use them to authenticate the transaction using the MetaMask API.

Schlussfolgerung

While integrating Metamask authentication via backend API calls is technically feasible, it presents several technical challenges that must be addressed. To overcome these challenges, a thorough feasibility study and implementation would be required. In addition, scalability and security issues need to be considered at every stage of the development process.

Custodial Coinbase